Archive for the ‘Biometric & Security’ Category

Fingerprint Enhancement Algorithm

Friday, December 14th, 2007

A critical step in automatic fingerprint matching is to automatically and reliably extract minutiae from the input fingerprint images. However, the performance of a minutiae extraction algorithm relies heavily on the quality of the input fingerprint images.

In order to ensure that the performance of an automatic fingerprint identification/verification system will be robust with respect to the quality of the fingerprint images, it is essential to incorporate a fingerprint enhancement algorithm in the minutiae extraction module. We have developed a fast fingerprint enhancement algorithm, which can adaptively improve the clarity of ridge and furrow structures of input fingerprint images based on the estimated local ridge orientation and frequency. We have evaluated the performance of the image enhancement algorithm using the goodness index of the extracted minutiae and the accuracy of an online fingerprint verification system. Experimental results show that incorporating the enhancement algorithms improves both the goodness index and the verification accuracy.

Relative links about fingerprint

The Classification of Fingerprint

Finger Print Matching

The Optimal Registration

Biometric Technology for Security

The Classification of Fingerprint

Friday, December 14th, 2007

Large volumes of fingerprints are collected and stored everyday in a wide range of applications including forensics, access control, and driver license registration. An automatic recognition of people based on fingerprints requires that the input fingerprint be matched with a large number of fingerprints in a database (FBI database contains approximately 70 million fingerprints!). To reduce the search time and computational complexity, it is desirable to classify these fingerprints in an accurate and consistent manner so that the input fingerprint is required to be matched only with a subset of the fingerprints in the database.

Fingerprint classification is a technique to assign a fingerprint into one of the several pre-specified types already established in the literature which can provide an indexing mechanism. Fingerprint classification can be viewed as a coarse level matching of the fingerprints. An input fingerprint is first matched at a coarse level to one of the pre-specified types and then, at a finer level, it is compared to the subset of the database containing that type of fingerprints only. We have developed an algorithm to classify fingerprints into five classes, namely, whorl, right loop, left loop, arch, and tented arch. The algorithm separates the number of ridges present in four directions (0 degree, 45 degree, 90 degree, and 135 degree) by filtering the central part of a fingerprint with a bank of Gabor filters. This information is quantized to generate a FingerCode which is used for classification. Our classification is based on a two-stage classifier which uses a K-nearest neighbor classifier in the first stage and a set of neural networks in the second stage. The classifier is tested on 4,000 images in the NIST-4 database. For the five-class problem, classification accuracy of 90% is achieved. For the four-class problem (arch and tented arch combined into one class), we are able to achieve a classification accuracy of 94.8%. By incorporating a reject option, the classification accuracy can be increased to 96% for the five-class classification and to 97.8% for the four-class classification when 30.8% of the images are rejected.

Relative links about fingerprint

Fingerpirnt Security for PC

Fingerprint Enhancement Algorithm

Finger Print Matching

The Optimal Registration

Biometric Technology for Security

Finger Print Matching

Friday, December 14th, 2007

Among all the biometric techniques, fingerprint-based identification is the oldest method which has been successfully used in numerous applications. Everyone is known to have unique, immutable fingerprints. A fingerprint is made of a series of ridges and furrows on the surface of the finger. The uniqueness of a fingerprint can be determined by the pattern of ridges and furrows as well as the minutiae points. Minutiae points are local ridge characteristics that occur at either a ridge bifurcation or a ridge ending.

Fingerprint matching techniques can be placed into two categories: minutae-based and correlation based. Minutiae-based techniques first find minutiae points and then map their relative placement on the finger.  However, there are some difficulties when using this approach. It is difficult to extract the minutiae points accurately when the fingerprint is of low quality. Also this method does not take into account the global pattern of ridges and furrows. The correlation-based method is able to overcome some of the difficulties of the minutiae-based approach.  However, it has some of its own shortcomings. Correlation-based techniques require the precise location of a registration point and are affected by image translation and rotation.

Fingerprint matching based on minutiae has problems in matching different sized (unregistered) minutiae patterns. Local ridge structures can not be completely characterized by minutiae. We are trying an alternate representation of fingerprints which will capture more local information and yield a fixed length code for the fingerprint. The matching will then hopefully become a relatively simple task of calculating the Euclidean distance will between the two codes.

We are developing algorithms which are more robust to noise in fingerprint images and deliver increased accuracy in real-time. A commercial fingerprint-based authentication system requires a very low False Reject Rate (FAR) for a given False Accept Rate (FAR). This is very difficult to achieve with any one technique. We are investigating methods to pool evidence from various matching techniques to increase the overall accuracy of the system. In a real application, the sensor, the acquisition system and the variation in performance of the system over time is very critical. We are also field testing our system on a limited number of users to evaluate the system performance over a period of time.

Relative links about fingerprint

Fingerpirnt Security for PC

Fingerprint Enhancement Algorithm

The Optimal Registration

Biometric Technology for Security

The Classification of Fingerprint

The Optimal Registration

Friday, December 14th, 2007

The “registration pattern” between two fingerprints is the optimal registration of each part of one fingerprint with respect to the other fingerprint.

Registration patterns generated from imposter’s matching attempts are different from those patterns from genuine matching attempts, although they may share some similarities in the aspect of minutiae. This paper presents an algorithm that utilizes minutiae, associate ridges and orientation fields to determine the registration pattern between two fingerprints and their similarity.

The proposed matching scheme has two stages. An offline training stage derives a genuine registration pattern base from a set of genuine matching attempts. Then, an online matching stage registers the two fingerprints and determines the registration pattern. Only if the pattern makes a genuine one, a further fine matching is conducted. The genuine registration pattern base is derived using a set of fingerprints extracted from the NIST Special Database 24. Experimental results on the second FVC2002 database demonstrate the performance of the propose.

Relative links about fingerprint

Fingerpirnt Security for PC

Fingerprint Enhancement Algorithm

The Classification of Fingerprint

Finger Print Matching

Biometric Technology for Security

Biometric Technology for Security

Tuesday, August 7th, 2007

fingerprint.gifSince the war on terrorism began, the

United States government has really clamped down on foreigners entering and leaving the country. Part of its plan for enhanced security is to use new technologies at its borders.

The USA Patriot Act and Border Security Act direct that the Attorney General and the Secretary of State jointly, through the National Institute of Standards and Technology, “develop and certify a technology standard, including appropriate biometric identifier standards, that can be used to verify the identity of persons applying for a

United States visa”.

A biometric is a physical characteristic that is unique to an individual. The standards would be used in all documents issued to foreigners by the State Department and the Immigration and Naturalisation Service, including student visas, green cards and border-crossing cards.Foreigners from about 180 countries require an immigrant or non-immigrant visa to enter the

United States. For more than a century, the entry-exit policies and processes were largely intended to deter illegal entry and citizenship claims, regulate legal migration to meet labour-market needs and administer benefit programmes.Since the terrorist attacks of September 11th, 2001, the

US is facing the challenge of having to identify, out of the millions of foreign nationals who come to the country each year, those who might be a threat to national security.
At the moment, the Immigration and Naturalisation Service (INS) has the authority to perform an inspection of each person who arrives at the

US border and to grant or deny admission.
Usually an INS inspector manually examines the person’s travel documents, which can often be falsified through photograph substitution. The biometric identifiers used today range from a photograph for most

US government-issued travel documents to a photograph and two fingerprints for Mexican border-crossing cards.
In addition, the INS issues an INSPASS card that allows low-risk travellers to use an automated kiosk and is based on hand geometry. The FBI has more than 45 million sets of 10 rolled fingerprints, the majority of which belong to US citizens. Over the past year, scientists at the National Institute of Standards and Technology looked at what is involved in issuing aliens with machine-readable, tamper-resistant visas and other travel documents with biometric security.Its Information Technology Laboratory measured fingerprint recognition ance on an INS database of 1.2 million prints of 620,000 individuals.The Face Recognition Vendor Tests 2002 measured the face recognition performance of 10 vendors on a Department of State database of 121,000 images of 37,000 individuals.Based on the evaluations, the institute recommends that a dual biometric system including two fingerprint images combined with facial scanning be used for verification. The biometrics would assist identity enrolment, background checks and identity verification. Each government agency would choose its own vendors.